Why Is Andrew Jackson On The $20 Bill?

Andrew Jackson is featured on the $20 bill due to his historical significance, but his legacy is controversial. At WHY.EDU.VN, we understand the importance of examining historical figures with nuance and providing context for their actions. Explore the rationale behind this decision and consider the arguments for and against his continued presence on U.S. currency. This is important as you evaluate historical representation, monetary history and cultural symbols.

1. Who Was Andrew Jackson?

Andrew Jackson (1767-1845) was the seventh President of the United States, serving from 1829 to 1837. A major general in the War of 1812, Jackson became a symbol of the common man, and his presidency ushered in what is known as the Jacksonian Era. He was a controversial figure, admired for his military leadership and populist policies, but also criticized for his actions towards Native Americans and his stance on states’ rights.

2. Why Is Andrew Jackson On The Bill?

Andrew Jackson’s image first appeared on the $20 bill in 1928. The decision to feature him was largely based on his popularity and historical significance at the time. His image replaced that of Grover Cleveland, who had previously been on the bill.

  • Historical Context: In the early 20th century, Jackson was seen as a symbol of American democracy and individualism.
  • Treasury Department Decision: The Treasury Department, under Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon, made the final decision. Mellon, a Republican, may have chosen Jackson, a Democrat, to appeal to a broader base.

3. Jackson’s Accomplishments and Significance

Jackson’s supporters point to several accomplishments to justify his place on the $20 bill:

  • Military Hero: His victory at the Battle of New Orleans in 1815 made him a national hero.
  • Champion of the Common Man: Jacksonian Democracy emphasized the rights of the common people and limited the power of the elite.
  • Preservation of the Union: Jackson firmly opposed nullification, a doctrine that allowed states to invalidate federal laws, thus preserving the Union during a critical period.

4. Controversies Surrounding Andrew Jackson

Despite his achievements, Jackson’s legacy is marred by controversy, particularly his policies towards Native Americans.

  • Indian Removal Act of 1830: This act authorized the forced removal of Native American tribes from their ancestral lands in the southeastern United States to lands west of the Mississippi River.
  • Trail of Tears: The forced relocation of the Cherokee Nation, known as the Trail of Tears, resulted in thousands of deaths due to starvation, exposure, and disease.
  • Slavery: Jackson was a slave owner, and his policies often supported the expansion of slavery.

5. The Indian Removal Act: A Closer Look

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a watershed moment in American history, reflecting the expansionist ambitions and racial attitudes of the time.

  • Background: For decades, American settlers had been encroaching on Native American lands, particularly in the states of Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and North Carolina. These states sought to assert their jurisdiction over tribal lands and remove Native Americans altogether.
  • Provisions: The act authorized the President to negotiate with Native American tribes for their removal to federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their ancestral lands. It provided funding for the relocation and resettlement of the tribes.
  • Implementation: The implementation of the Indian Removal Act was often brutal and coercive. Native American tribes were pressured into signing treaties ceding their lands, and those who resisted faced military force.

6. The Trail of Tears: A National Tragedy

The Trail of Tears stands as one of the most tragic episodes in American history, symbolizing the suffering and injustice inflicted upon Native Americans.

  • Cherokee Nation: The Cherokee Nation, one of the most advanced and acculturated tribes, resisted removal and sought legal recourse.
  • Supreme Court Ruling: In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was a sovereign entity and that Georgia’s laws had no force within its territory. However, Jackson ignored the ruling and proceeded with the removal.
  • Forced Removal: In 1838, the U.S. Army forcibly removed over 16,000 Cherokees from their homes and marched them over 1,200 miles to present-day Oklahoma.
  • Devastating Losses: The journey was arduous and poorly provisioned, resulting in the deaths of approximately 4,000 Cherokees, earning it the name “Trail of Tears.”

7. Jackson’s Stance on States’ Rights and Nullification

Jackson’s presidency was marked by a conflict over states’ rights and the doctrine of nullification, which threatened to tear the Union apart.

  • Tariff of Abominations: In 1828, Congress passed a high tariff that angered Southern states, who felt it unfairly benefited Northern manufacturers at their expense.
  • Nullification Crisis: South Carolina, led by Vice President John C. Calhoun, declared the tariff null and void within its borders and threatened to secede from the Union if the federal government attempted to enforce it.
  • Jackson’s Response: Jackson firmly opposed nullification and asserted the supremacy of federal law. He threatened to use military force to enforce the tariff and warned South Carolina against secession.
  • Compromise: A compromise tariff, brokered by Henry Clay, averted a potential civil war and preserved the Union.

8. Arguments for Removing Jackson from the $20 Bill

In recent years, there has been growing support for removing Jackson from the $20 bill due to his controversial legacy.

  • Moral Objections: Critics argue that honoring a figure who perpetrated ethnic cleansing and supported slavery is morally reprehensible.
  • Symbolic Significance: They believe that removing Jackson would send a powerful message about America’s commitment to racial justice and reconciliation.
  • Alternative Candidates: Proponents of change suggest replacing Jackson with a more deserving historical figure who better represents American values.

9. Arguments for Keeping Jackson on the $20 Bill

Despite the controversies, some argue that Jackson’s place on the $20 bill should be maintained.

  • Historical Context: They contend that Jackson should be judged within the context of his time and that his actions were consistent with the prevailing attitudes of the era.
  • Recognition of Complexity: They argue that removing Jackson would erase an important part of American history and fail to acknowledge the complexities of his legacy.
  • Potential for Education: They believe that Jackson’s presence on the $20 bill provides an opportunity to educate Americans about the darker aspects of their history and to promote critical thinking.

10. The Movement to Replace Jackson with Harriet Tubman

In 2016, the Obama administration announced plans to replace Andrew Jackson with Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill.

  • Harriet Tubman: Tubman was an abolitionist and Underground Railroad conductor who led hundreds of slaves to freedom.
  • Symbolic Choice: Her selection was widely praised as a fitting tribute to a true American hero and a powerful symbol of racial equality.
  • Delayed Implementation: The Trump administration delayed the implementation of the redesign, and the current status remains uncertain.

11. Alternative Historical Figures Considered

Besides Harriet Tubman, several other historical figures have been suggested as potential replacements for Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill.

Candidate Description
Eleanor Roosevelt First Lady, diplomat, and activist who championed human rights and social justice.
Martin Luther King Jr. Civil rights leader who fought for racial equality and social change.
Rosa Parks Civil rights activist whose refusal to give up her seat on a bus sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott.
Frederick Douglass Abolitionist, orator, and writer who advocated for the rights of African Americans.

12. Public Opinion on the Matter

Public opinion on the issue of Andrew Jackson’s presence on the $20 bill is divided.

  • Polls: Surveys have shown a range of opinions, with some supporting the change and others opposing it.
  • Political Divide: The issue has become increasingly politicized, with Democrats generally favoring the change and Republicans often opposing it.
  • Generational Differences: Younger Americans are more likely to support the change than older Americans.

13. The Role of Symbols in Society

The debate over Andrew Jackson’s image on the $20 bill highlights the importance of symbols in society.

  • Representation: Symbols represent values, beliefs, and historical narratives.
  • Contested Meanings: The meanings of symbols can be contested and change over time.
  • Impact on Identity: Symbols can shape individual and collective identities.

14. The Broader Context of Historical Reassessment

The movement to remove Jackson from the $20 bill is part of a broader trend of historical reassessment.

  • Re-evaluating Historical Figures: Many historical figures are being re-evaluated in light of contemporary values and perspectives.
  • Challenging Dominant Narratives: Dominant historical narratives are being challenged to include the experiences and perspectives of marginalized groups.
  • Promoting Inclusive History: There is a growing emphasis on promoting a more inclusive and accurate understanding of history.

15. The Design of U.S. Currency: A Historical Perspective

The design of U.S. currency has evolved over time, reflecting changing artistic styles, technological advancements, and cultural values.

  • Early Designs: Early U.S. currency featured portraits of presidents, Founding Fathers, and other prominent figures, as well as allegorical symbols and images.
  • Bureau of Engraving and Printing: The Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) is responsible for designing and producing U.S. currency.
  • Security Features: Modern U.S. currency incorporates advanced security features to deter counterfeiting, such as watermarks, security threads, and color-shifting ink.

16. The Process of Changing U.S. Currency Designs

Changing the design of U.S. currency is a complex and lengthy process involving multiple government agencies.

  • Treasury Department: The Treasury Department has overall responsibility for U.S. currency.
  • Bureau of Engraving and Printing: The BEP is responsible for designing and producing the new currency.
  • Secret Service: The Secret Service is involved in ensuring the security of the new currency.
  • Public Input: Public input is often sought during the design process.

17. The Economic Implications of Changing Currency Designs

Changing currency designs can have significant economic implications.

  • Cost of Redesign and Production: The cost of redesigning and producing new currency can be substantial.
  • Impact on Counterfeiting: New security features can help to deter counterfeiting.
  • Public Acceptance: Public acceptance of the new designs is important for a smooth transition.

18. International Examples of Currency Design Changes

Many countries have changed their currency designs over time to reflect changing cultural values, commemorate historical events, or improve security features.

  • Euro: The introduction of the euro in 2002 involved a complete redesign of currency for the participating countries.
  • Canadian Dollar: Canada has introduced new polymer banknotes with advanced security features and updated designs.
  • British Pound: The United Kingdom has gradually replaced older banknotes with new polymer banknotes featuring updated designs and security features.

19. The Future of the $20 Bill

The future of the $20 bill remains uncertain, but the debate over Andrew Jackson’s presence on it is likely to continue.

  • Potential for Redesign: The possibility of redesigning the $20 bill with Harriet Tubman or another historical figure remains open.
  • Ongoing Debate: The debate over Jackson’s legacy and the role of symbols in society is likely to continue.
  • Importance of Education: Educating Americans about the complexities of their history is crucial for fostering a more inclusive and just society.

20. Conclusion: Evaluating Historical Figures and Symbols

Andrew Jackson’s presence on the $20 bill is a complex issue that reflects the ongoing debate over how to evaluate historical figures and symbols in light of contemporary values. While Jackson was a significant figure in American history, his actions towards Native Americans and his support for slavery have led many to question whether he deserves such a prominent honor. As society evolves, it is essential to engage in critical reflection and reassessment of the symbols and figures that represent American identity. This process is vital for fostering a more inclusive and just society that acknowledges the complexities and contradictions of its past.

At WHY.EDU.VN, we believe in providing comprehensive and nuanced perspectives on historical events and figures. We encourage you to explore our website for more in-depth analysis and resources related to American history, cultural symbols, and the ongoing debates shaping our society.

Uncover more about Andrew Jackson, monetary symbols, and legacy assessments.

FAQ: Andrew Jackson and the $20 Bill

1. Why was Andrew Jackson chosen for the $20 bill?
Andrew Jackson was selected due to his historical prominence and perceived representation of American democracy in the early 20th century.

2. What are the main controversies surrounding Andrew Jackson?
The major controversies include his role in the Indian Removal Act, the Trail of Tears, and his stance as a slave owner.

3. What was the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
This act authorized the forced removal of Native American tribes from their ancestral lands to areas west of the Mississippi River.

4. What is the Trail of Tears?
The Trail of Tears refers to the forced relocation of the Cherokee Nation, resulting in thousands of deaths due to harsh conditions.

5. Why is there a movement to remove Jackson from the $20 bill?
The movement is driven by moral objections to honoring someone who perpetrated ethnic cleansing and supported slavery.

6. Who is Harriet Tubman and why is she considered as a replacement?
Harriet Tubman was an abolitionist and Underground Railroad conductor, seen as a fitting symbol of racial equality and a true American hero.

7. What other historical figures have been suggested as replacements for Jackson?
Other figures include Eleanor Roosevelt, Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, and Frederick Douglass.

8. How does the design of U.S. currency change?
Changes involve multiple government agencies, including the Treasury Department, Bureau of Engraving and Printing, and sometimes public input.

9. What are the economic implications of changing currency designs?
Implications include the cost of redesign and production, potential impact on counterfeiting, and public acceptance.

10. How do symbols impact society?
Symbols represent values, beliefs, and historical narratives, shaping individual and collective identities and often leading to contested meanings.

Do you have more questions about historical figures or U.S. currency? At WHY.EDU.VN, we’re dedicated to providing accurate and insightful answers. Visit our site at why.edu.vn, located at 101 Curiosity Lane, Answer Town, CA 90210, United States. Contact us via WhatsApp at +1 (213) 555-0101 and let our experts help you understand the complexities of history and culture.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *