Nearly a month prior to the election, Kamala Harris engaged in what was anticipated to be a welcoming interview on ABC’s The View. The appearance was intended to introduce her more intimately to American voters and solidify her position as a strong candidate. However, the interview took an unexpected turn when she was questioned about what she would have done differently from the incumbent President Joe Biden. Her response, “Not a thing comes to mind,” quickly became a focal point of criticism and a recurring theme in Republican attack ads. This seemingly minor misstep highlighted the significant political obstacles that her campaign, despite an energetic start, ultimately failed to overcome, culminating in her decisive loss to Donald Trump on Tuesday.
Publicly conceding the race on Wednesday afternoon, Harris urged her supporters to “do not despair.” However, within Democratic circles, the defeat has triggered a period of intense introspection. The party is now grappling with questions about where her campaign faltered, what strategic adjustments could have been made, and, more broadly, the future direction of the Democratic Party itself.
In the immediate aftermath of the election results, Harris campaign officials remained silent. Behind the scenes, some aides expressed profound disappointment and shock, as many had anticipated a much tighter race. “Losing is unfathomably painful. It is hard,” Jen O’Malley Dillon, Harris’s campaign manager, acknowledged in an email to staff, indicating the deep emotional toll and the lengthy process of recovery ahead.
As the sitting vice-president, Kamala Harris faced the considerable challenge of distancing herself from President Biden’s low approval ratings while simultaneously appealing to voters seeking change amid widespread economic unease. This delicate balancing act proved to be a pivotal factor in her campaign’s inability to resonate with a broad enough electorate.
Kamala Harris’s interview on “The View” aimed to broaden her appeal to American women voters but faced unexpected challenges.
The Weight of Biden’s Unpopularity
Kamala Harris’s ascent to the top of the Democratic ticket was marked by unique circumstances. Following Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the race after a widely criticized debate performance, Harris was swiftly positioned as the party’s nominee, bypassing the rigorous scrutiny of primary elections and without a single vote being cast in a primary contest.
Launching her campaign, Harris promised a “new generation of leadership.” Her initial strategy focused on mobilizing women voters around the issue of abortion rights and appealing to working-class voters by addressing pressing economic concerns such as rising living costs and housing affordability.
In the initial months leading up to election day, her campaign generated significant buzz. This included a surge of social media engagement, celebrity endorsements from figures like Taylor Swift, and a substantial influx of campaign donations. However, this initial momentum proved insufficient to counteract the pervasive anti-Biden sentiment that permeated a significant portion of the electorate.
President Biden’s approval ratings had consistently remained in the low 40s throughout his term. Furthermore, public sentiment indicated widespread dissatisfaction with the country’s direction, with approximately two-thirds of voters expressing the belief that the United States was on the wrong track. This prevailing negativity surrounding the current administration became a considerable anchor for Harris’s campaign.
Some within the Democratic party privately questioned whether Harris’s unwavering loyalty to President Biden ultimately hindered her ability to appeal to voters seeking a departure from the status quo. However, Jamal Simmons, the vice-president’s former communications director, described this dilemma as a “trap.” He argued that any attempt to create distance from Biden would have been strategically exploited by Republicans, providing them with an easily weaponized narrative of disloyalty and party division.
Harris attempted to navigate this delicate political tightrope. She aimed to acknowledge and address the administration’s track record without directly criticizing her superior. This approach involved a noticeable reluctance to openly distance herself from Biden’s policies, while simultaneously avoiding their explicit promotion on the campaign trail. Ultimately, this strategy failed to deliver a compelling and distinct vision for her leadership. She struggled to articulate a convincing rationale for her presidency and how she would effectively tackle prevalent economic anxieties and widespread concerns related to immigration.
Failure to Expand Beyond Biden’s Base
A core component of the Harris campaign strategy was to rebuild and expand upon the diverse voting coalition that had propelled Biden to victory in 2020. This strategy hinged on solidifying support from key Democratic demographics—African American, Latino, and young voters—while further expanding inroads with college-educated suburban voters.
However, election results revealed a significant underperformance among these critical voter segments. Exit polls indicated a 13-point swing away among Latino voters, a 2-point decrease in support from Black voters, and a 6-point decline among voters under 30. While final vote counts might slightly alter these figures, these initial results pointed to concerning trends in voter support.
Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont who had previously contended for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020, commented that it was “no great surprise” that working-class voters were increasingly distancing themselves from the Democratic Party.
“First, it was the white working class, and now it is Latino and black workers as well,” Sanders stated. “While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change. And they’re right.” This statement underscored a broader sentiment of disconnect between the Democratic establishment and significant portions of the working class.
While Kamala Harris largely maintained support among women voters against Donald Trump, her advantage did not reach the levels her campaign had anticipated, especially considering the historic nature of her candidacy. Furthermore, her campaign aspirations of winning over suburban Republican women proved unsuccessful, with 53% of white women voting against her.
In this election, marking the first presidential contest since the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the constitutional right to abortion, Democrats had hoped that Harris’s strong emphasis on reproductive rights would translate into a decisive electoral advantage. However, while approximately 54% of female voters cast their ballots for Harris, this figure fell short of the 57% who supported Biden in 2020, suggesting that this issue, while important, was not the decisive factor many had predicted.
The Trump Referendum Strategy Backfires
Even before securing the Democratic nomination, Kamala Harris’s campaign strategy increasingly focused on framing the election as a referendum on Donald Trump, rather than a direct contest between herself and Trump on policy and vision.
Drawing upon her background as a former California prosecutor, Harris sought to build a case against the former president, highlighting his controversial past and perceived threats to democratic norms.
Initially, her campaign appeared to diverge from Biden’s central argument that Trump represented an existential threat to democracy. Instead, they prioritized a more optimistic and “joyful” message centered on safeguarding personal freedoms and strengthening the middle class.
However, in the campaign’s final weeks, a tactical shift occurred. Harris decided to re-emphasize the perceived dangers of a second Trump presidency. She sharpened her rhetoric, labeling Trump a “fascist” and actively campaigned alongside Republicans who had become disillusioned with his leadership.
Following reports that Trump had expressed admiration for Adolf Hitler, Harris delivered a public statement outside her official residence, characterizing the former president as “unhinged and unstable.” This late-stage pivot indicated a return to a more confrontational strategy focused on directly attacking Trump’s character and fitness for office.
Veteran Republican pollster Frank Luntz offered a critical assessment of this strategic shift. He noted on Tuesday night that “Kamala Harris lost this election when she pivoted to focus almost exclusively on attacking Donald Trump.”
Luntz elaborated, “Voters already know everything there is about Trump – but they still wanted to know more about Harris’s plans for the first hour, first day, first month and first year of her administration.” He concluded, “It was a colossal failure for her campaign to shine the spotlight on Trump more than on Harris’s own ideas.”
Ultimately, the necessary coalition for Harris to defeat Trump did not materialize. The resounding rejection of the Democratic candidate by voters suggested that the party’s challenges extended beyond the unpopularity of the incumbent president, indicating deeper systemic issues and voter disconnects that need to be addressed for future electoral success.
Election result graphic illustrating voter sentiment and key demographic shifts in the 2024 US Presidential Election.
Promotional banner for the “US Election Unspun” newsletter, offering in-depth analysis of US politics.
For deeper insights into US politics and its global implications, subscribe to the US Election Unspun newsletter by North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher. Readers in the UK can sign up here, and those outside the UK can sign up here.
