When you’re in the kitchen, carefully following a recipe, you routinely encounter abbreviations for measurements. We easily recognize “tsp.” for teaspoon and “pt.” for pint. But when it comes to weight, the abbreviation for pound, “lb,” often stands out as peculiar. Have you ever paused to wonder why pounds is abbreviated as “lbs” when the letters “l” and “b” don’t even appear in the word “pound”? Let’s embark on a linguistic journey to uncover the fascinating origin of this seemingly illogical abbreviation.
The answer takes us back to ancient Rome and the Latin language, the bedrock of many modern languages, including English. The term “pound” as a unit of weight has its roots in the Roman phrase “libra pondo.” In Latin, “libra” signifies “balance” or “scales,” while “pondo” translates to “weight.” Therefore, “libra pondo” literally meant “a pound by weight” or “weight by the pound.”
While the English word “pound” is derived from the “pondo” part of this Latin phrase, the abbreviation “lb.” surprisingly comes from “libra.” This might seem counterintuitive at first, but it’s a testament to how historical linguistic influences shape our modern conventions. The abbreviation “lb” is essentially a direct inheritance from the Roman system of measurement.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/gettyimages-497680074-2000-66d82ea4197a41d99492a9a6bc5b5c30.jpg)
The influence of “libra” extends beyond just the abbreviation “lb.” Consider the symbol for the British pound sterling, £. This symbol, a stylized “L” with a horizontal line through it, is also derived from “libra.” According to historical accounts, the pound’s value was originally equivalent to the price of a pound of silver, further solidifying the connection to this ancient unit of weight. Interestingly, the legacy of “libra” in currency measurements isn’t limited to the British pound. The former Italian currency, the lira, also shares its etymological roots with “libra,” highlighting the widespread historical significance of this Roman term for weight.
If the word “libra” sounds familiar in another context, you might be thinking of Libra, the seventh sign of the Zodiac. Represented by scales, the astrological sign Libra symbolizes balance, harmony, and, fittingly, weights and measurements. This connection further underscores the deep-rooted association of “libra” with the concept of weighing and balance.
Now, let’s turn our attention to another common unit of weight: the ounce, which is 1/16th of a pound. The word “ounce” also traces its origins back to Latin, specifically to the word “uncia.” “Uncia” in Roman times denoted both a unit of weight and a unit of length. As languages evolved, particularly with the emergence of Anglo-Norman French in England after the Norman invasion in 1066, “uncia” transformed into “ounce.”
However, the abbreviation “oz” for ounce takes yet another detour through linguistic history. While the word “ounce” comes from Anglo-Norman French, the abbreviation “oz.” is derived from medieval Italian. The Italian language adopted the Latin “uncia” and morphed it into “onza,” introducing the “z” sound. This “z” then found its way into the English abbreviation “oz,” preserving a trace of its Italian linguistic journey.
Frequently Asked Questions About Pounds and Lbs
Is lb. metric or imperial?
Pounds (lb.) belong to the imperial measurement system, a system commonly used in the United States and a few other countries. The metric system equivalent of pounds is kilograms. For reference, one kilogram is approximately equal to 2.2 pounds.
What is the plural abbreviation of pounds?
The abbreviation for both singular and plural pounds is “lb.” While traditional grammatical rules dictate that abbreviations for measurements remain the same in plural form, you might sometimes see “lbs” used as the plural abbreviation for pounds. Both “lb.” and “lbs.” are generally accepted as correct abbreviations for plural pounds, though “lb.” is considered more formally correct.
In conclusion, the seemingly unusual abbreviation “lb” for pounds is a fascinating echo of ancient Roman language and measurement systems. It’s a linguistic vestige that connects us to a historical past where Latin reigned and “libra pondo” was the standard for weight. Similarly, “oz” for ounce carries a blend of Latin, French, and Italian influences, showcasing the intricate and often surprising pathways of language evolution.
