Recent polls and political analyses suggest that Vice President Kamala Harris is facing significant headwinds as the next election approaches. Despite her high-profile position and the backing of the Democratic party, concerns are mounting about her ability to connect with voters and articulate a compelling vision for the future. This article delves into the key factors contributing to the question: Why Is Harris Losing momentum and struggling to solidify her political standing?
Harris’s difficulties are becoming increasingly apparent. Even with the election drawing nearer, she appears to be grappling with defining her political identity beyond simply being the “not-Trump” or “not-Biden” candidate. This struggle was evident in a recent televised interview where, instead of outlining a forward-looking agenda, she primarily focused on criticizing the “last decade” and the previous administration. While denouncing Donald Trump remains a common Democratic strategy, voters are increasingly seeking more than just opposition. They want to understand what Harris specifically offers and how her leadership will directly improve their lives. The current political climate demands concrete plans and solutions, and the perception that Harris lacks a distinct policy platform is proving to be a significant obstacle.
A Platform of Ambiguity: What Does Harris Stand For?
The core challenge for the Harris campaign appears to be a lack of a clear and resonant policy platform. While consistently campaigning against Donald Trump and his policies, the campaign has struggled to articulate a compelling positive vision that gives voters reasons to enthusiastically vote for Harris and her running mate. Political conventions, like the recent Democratic National Convention (DNC), often provide a temporary boost in visibility and excitement. However, these effects are typically short-lived. As election day nears, voters’ focus inevitably shifts back to their daily concerns – particularly economic anxieties fueled by rising living costs. The increasing prices of housing, both rentals and home sales, alongside escalating grocery bills and overall economic insecurity, are pressing issues for many Americans.
Harris’s attempts to address these concerns with phrases like “an opportunity economy” have fallen flat due to their vagueness. While promising an economy “where everyone has the chance to compete and a chance to succeed” sounds appealing, it doesn’t address the fundamental insecurities many Americans face. The reality is that many feel they are already relentlessly pursuing “opportunities” in a precarious economic landscape, often relying on gig work and social media virality for financial stability. What voters arguably need is not just more “opportunities,” but a robust safety net and assurance that basic needs like housing, food, transportation, and education will be met without constant economic strain.
On critical issues such as abortion rights, Harris’s stance, while supportive, lacks a strong, proactive agenda. Her primary approach has been to criticize Trump’s anti-abortion stance, but her own proposals often sound reactive and limited. For example, her statement that she would “proudly sign into law” a congressional bill to restore reproductive freedom lacks the proactive leadership voters might expect. It conveys a sense of administrative compliance rather than a driving force for change. Voters are looking for a candidate who will champion and actively fight for abortion access, not just passively approve legislation if it reaches her desk. The absence of a concrete plan to guarantee abortion rights – free, accessible, and without undue restrictions – weakens her appeal on this crucial issue.
Furthermore, much of Harris’s public discourse, including her DNC acceptance speech, has focused on her personal history and critiques of Trump. While personal narratives can be valuable in connecting with voters, they are insufficient as the central pillar of a presidential campaign. Trump, despite his controversial past, also represents the past in many ways. While highlighting the dangers of another Trump presidency is crucial for Democrats, it isn’t enough to solely rely on fear and negativity. Voters need to be convinced that Harris offers a tangible alternative with clear plans and policies to improve their lives. The perception that the campaign’s message boils down to “Trust me, don’t ask for specifics” is reminiscent of the criticisms leveled against Hillary Clinton in 2016, and risks alienating voters seeking substantive solutions.
Disconnecting from Key Voter Segments: Taking Voters for Granted
The Democratic party, and by extension the Harris campaign, is facing increasing criticism for appearing to take key voter segments for granted. The rise of the “Uncommitted movement” signaled a significant dissent within the Democratic base, particularly concerning the administration’s stance on the Gaza conflict. While initially seen as a powerful expression of progressive discontent, the movement’s influence appears to have been diluted, failing to secure a speaking spot at the DNC and softening its message. Despite this, the DNC’s apparent dismissal of the Uncommitted movement and its concerns has been perceived as a strategic misstep.
Even if some voters are not directly aligned with the Uncommitted movement, the optics of silencing dissenting voices within the party can be damaging. The spectacle of delegates being denied a platform, particularly on the night of Harris’s acceptance speech, may resonate longer with voters than the carefully orchestrated messaging of the DNC itself. The incident has also garnered media attention, further amplifying the perception of a disconnect between the Democratic establishment and segments of its base.
More critically, the Harris campaign risks alienating voters by dismissing the concerns of the Uncommitted movement and other blocs critical of her stance on Gaza. This is particularly relevant given the growing political awareness and mobilization within communities of color. The traditional Democratic strategy of warning voters that a vote against the Democratic candidate is a vote for Trump may no longer be effective, especially among voters who feel their concerns are being ignored. The increasing alliance between progressive African Americans, other communities of color, and Palestinian-Americans, who have historically faced marginalization from both sides of the political spectrum, suggests a shift in voter dynamics that Democrats may be underestimating.
Abandoning Liberal and Progressive Values?
Further contributing to concerns about Harris’s appeal is the perception that her platform is increasingly indistinguishable from more centrist or even conservative positions. On immigration, her statements have been notably vague and cautious. Phrases like “We can create an earned pathway to citizenship and secure our border” lack concrete commitments and policy details. The heavy reliance on the word “can” suggests a lack of firm intention and raises questions about the administration’s actual priorities on immigration reform.
Similarly, her pronouncements on military strength have leaned into hawkish rhetoric. Her assertion that, “As commander in chief, I will ensure America always has the strongest, most lethal fighting force in the world,” while perhaps intended to project strength, strikes a discordant note with traditionally liberal and progressive voters. The unnuanced embrace of “lethal” force, without any tempering language about diplomacy or peaceful solutions, can be perceived as a departure from core Democratic values.
The Unacknowledged Pandemic: COVID-19 and Public Health Neglect
An often-overlooked factor that could significantly impact voter sentiment and potentially Harris’s chances is the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Despite attempts to downplay its severity, COVID-19 remains a persistent public health crisis with significant social and economic consequences. The shift in public health messaging, exemplified by the CDC’s revised guidelines, which have been criticized as minimizing the risks and encouraging disease spread, has created a sense of public health neglect. Experts have warned against these relaxed guidelines, emphasizing the continued importance of masking, social distancing, and robust public health measures.
Despite the availability of new vaccines, vaccination rates are declining, fueled by misinformation and a widespread perception that COVID-19 is “just a cold.” The termination of programs like the Bridge program, which ensured vaccine access for the uninsured, further exacerbates the problem, leaving vulnerable populations at greater risk as infection rates surge.
The continued impact of COVID-19, though often absent from mainstream political discourse, is undeniable. From supply chain disruptions and staffing shortages to widespread illness and the long-term effects of Long COVID, the pandemic continues to affect daily life and economic stability. The health crisis also has potential political ramifications, including impacting voter turnout and contributing to a general sense of despondency among a public that feels misled and underserved by public health institutions.
The Harris campaign, like much of the political establishment, appears to be underestimating the lingering impact of COVID-19. This neglect of public health concerns, coupled with the other challenges outlined above, contributes to the growing narrative of why Harris is losing ground. The perception that the Democratic party is taking voters for granted, mirroring the missteps of the 2016 election, is a significant warning sign. While conventions and political rallies can generate temporary enthusiasm, sustained voter support requires a clear vision, concrete policies, and a genuine responsiveness to the electorate’s concerns. Without a significant shift in strategy and messaging, the question of “why is Harris losing?” may become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
References
CBS News. (2024). Rent costs in US: Here’s why rentals are still so expensive. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rent-cost-us-2024-housing-national/
CNN. (2024). Transcript: Kamala Harris’s interview with Dana Bash. https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/29/politics/harris-walz-interview-read-transcript/index.html
Electronic Intifada. Tags: mass rape accusation. https://electronicintifada.net/tags/mass-rape-accusation
Medpage Today. (2024). COVID-19 infections reported after Democratic National Convention. https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/111709
Mother Jones. (2024). The DNC wouldn’t let the ‘Uncommitted’ movement speak. So it released its speech. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/08/dnc-speech-uncommitted-movement-harris-walz-ruwan-romman/
NAR Realtor Magazine. (2024). Home prices are still rising in 85% of US cities. https://www.nar.realtor/magazine/real-estate-news/home-prices-are-still-rising-in-85-of-us-cities
News-Medical.Net. (2024). Study reveals long-COVID’s wide impact on children’s health. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20240822/Study-reveals-long-COVIDs-wide-impact-on-childrens-health.aspx
New York Times, The. (2024). Harris struggles to define herself in first solo interview of campaign. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/08/us/politics/trump-and-harris-times-siena-poll.html
New York Times, The. (2024). Kamala Harris speech transcript at the Democratic convention, annotated. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/23/us/politics/kamala-harris-speech-transcript.html
New York Times, The. (2024). New Covid boosters are coming this fall. Here’s what to know. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/22/health/covid-booster-vaccines.html
New York Times, The. (2024). On ‘The Daily’: The Kamala Harris question. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/08/podcasts/the-daily/kamala-harris-democrats.html
New York Times, The. (2020). The Swiss cheese model of pandemic defense. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/05/health/coronavirus-swiss-cheese-infection-mackay.html
People’s CDC. https://peoplescdc.org/
ProMedica. (2024). Vaccination use is declining: Here’s what parents should know. https://www.promedica.org/blog/vaccination-use-is-declining-heres-what-parents-should-know
The Guardian. (2024). ‘Uncommitted’ delegates denied chance to speak at DNC amid deadline drama. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/22/uncommitted-movement-deadline-delegates-democratic-convention-protest
The Nation. (2024). The poverty rate is spiking as pandemic aid disappears. https://www.thenation.com/article/economy/poverty-rate-coronavirus-recession/
Time Magazine. (2024). CDC updates COVID-19 isolation guidelines. https://time.com/6695102/covid-19-isolation-guidelines-experts/
Uncommitted Movement. https://www.uncommittedmovement.com/
USA Today. (2024). Wastewater data shows COVID-19 summer surge is growing across the US. https://www.usatoday.com/story/graphics/2024/08/19/covid-19-summer-surge-wastewater-data-cdc/74798498007/
WGN9 Chicago. (2024). What’s behind the rising costs at the grocery store?. https://wgntv.com/news/cover-story/whats-behind-the-rising-costs-at-the-grocery-store/
Working Families Party. (2024). Letter from progressives to Harris-Walz. https://workingfamilies.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Letter-from-Progressives-to-Harris-Walz.pdf
American Military News. (2024). Schools forced to close amid COVID surge. https://americanmilitarynews.com/2024/08/schools-forced-to-close-amid-covid-surge/
