Drake recently filed a defamation lawsuit against UMG, claiming the label profited from Kendrick Lamar’s song “Control,” which allegedly sparked violence. UMG responded by dismissing the lawsuit as “meritless,” arguing Drake lost a rap battle he initiated and is now trying to “save face.” They highlighted Drake’s history of using UMG’s platform for similar attacks on Lamar.
UMG’s lawyers stated Drake willingly participated in the battle and should accept defeat instead of suing his label. They emphasized that “Not Like Us” is not defamatory. Drake’s attorney, Michael J. Gottlieb, countered that UMG is attempting to distract from its responsibility for profiting from dangerous misinformation that led to violence. He asserted the lawsuit will expose UMG’s history of endangering and exploiting artists. The case centers on whether “Control” is defamatory and whether UMG is liable for alleged resulting violence. The ongoing legal battle highlights the complex relationship between artists, record labels, and creative expression in the context of rap battles and potential consequences.
